As we await the first leg of the Champions League with Mourinho Pep unknown and playing at home where best to play, here also the carnival begins. Pompei returned
a tener una de sus actuaciones habituales en la derrota de Racing frente a Argentinos, errando para los dos lados. Y errando a favor y en contra de Teo Gutierrez. Es verdad que la amarilla por simular es objetable (de hecho, Pompei la asume como error aca ). El problema es que no dice nada del planchazo artero que le aplico el colombiano a Bogado. Encima, Bogado lo fue a buscar a Teo y declaro luego que el colombiano "tiene mala leche" ( aca ). Y Teo saco otro conejo de la galera, pidiendo disculpas por el planchazo pero acusando a sus rivales de racistas ( aca ).
En el medio, Hugo Barrientos dice que es una locura que le saquen la amarilla a Teo ( aca ) y Ferrero tira la pregunta retorica expected: "Do you absolve the yellow and red do not put the flop?" ( here.)
Try to avoid discussions on the bad milk - Barrientos has reason to say that Matt's was worse than in the - and discussions about racism - certainly reasonable although rare in a country where slavery was abolished from birth where, not coincidentally, the melting pot does not include the "black race" (not a race, but this is a football blog ...)
The fundamental question is, here, the annulment of the arbitral award that will allow you Matt Gutierrez River play against the cancellation of the yellow card. This is one of the repercussions of failure Galmarini. There will be given the right to Grondona - For once - and conservative football. Because the ruling Galmarini opens the floodgates to a torrent of complaints from coaches, players and officials weeping fair considering everything that harms rivals and unfair everything that hurts them. Certainly there are cases and cases. The cameras show that Galmarini not touch the ball with his hand. And although it also shows that Matt did not pretend, can not look just a piece of the movie and ignore the belly flop, he deserved red. What do we do then? Can you review the decision of an arbitrator or isolated have to review everything that went wrong? Does it deserve the same yellow the fool who takes his shirt to celebrate, the protester because it is right, the protester because is right, which plunges to see if it draws a penalty, which does not dive but falls as the sticking without the ball, which hit the back, which touches the hand, etc etc etc?
In a country that won its first World Cup between suspicion by 6-1 to Peru, which won its second in the world with a goal in the quarterfinals with his hand, and went to another final in 90 by the same hand in line against Russia (without penalty and without expulsion), which is reminiscent of arbitration is the Codesal criminal ... In other words, we can not expect noble and fair attitudes.
solution?
The real solution is fair play. But that seems hard to ask professional players.
then?
suggest two.
(1) change rules. There must be something between the yellow and red. And some mistakes should not be missed.
(2) must punish the referees, with more severity than today.
rectify faults that have nothing to do with whether the ball entered complete (the only incontrovertible) is open the door to opportunists who live and call in the best one for me and one for you. There is, of course, the risk of running out of arbitrators if the penalties are stiff. But worse is to start playing matches Viamonte street with these cameras.
not a minor issue: if the parties decide in an office, these cameramen are becoming actors. Because the cameras do not walk alone, there is a monkey who run them. And sometimes distracted looking at the bench or face the hassle of striker who missed a goal while a few meters a broken elbow and a forward head takes her hand.
And not just about the awkwardness. In this environment, it is not at all unreasonable to think that a cameraman can be "fixed" to show just what it display. In other words, Pompei is a disaster (worse was his father, Jose Maria, eternal arbiter of Olavarria once locked me strong echo of the ball ...)
But I prefer a bad referee that a "good" cameraman.
0 comments:
Post a Comment